<< December 2010 | Home | February 2011 >>

Superstreet Traffic Design

New Study Shows Design to be Safer, Faster

Anyone who has felt the frustration that accompanies battling traffic to drive to work can smile at this news—engineers are working on making your drive faster and safer. One possible solution is something called a “superstreet” traffic design. The superstreet design re-routes any driver looking to make a left-hand turn or trying to cross a thoroughfare, funneling them to the right before they make a quick U-turn around a broad median. 

A recent study performed by North Carolina State University researchers showed that the superstreet design results in a 20 percent overall reduction in travel time compared to conventional traffic designs. The researchers also found that the superstreet design is substantially safer than traditional intersections. Superstreet intersections experienced 46 percent fewer car collisions, and 63 percent fewer collisions that resulted in personal injuries.
 
The savings in time can be attributed to drivers not being stuck waiting to make left hand turns, or not having to wait for traffic from cross-streets to cross the thoroughfare. Superstreets do a better job of keeping traffic moving. The increased safety can be attributed to drivers not having to turn, from a standstill, across several lanes of traffic that are moving in the opposite direction.
 
While the superstreet design has actually been around for two decades, this was the largest analysis of superstreets ever performed in real traffic conditions.

New LEED Rating System under Development

The next version of the LEED Rating System is under development, with the first Public Comment Period having closed on January 19. According to the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), over 5000 comments were received from LEED stakeholders. Revisions to the rating system language will be made by staff and LEED committees based on these comments. The second Public Comment Period is expected to begin in July 2011.

Design professionals should take the time to participate and contribute to the development of codes and regulations that affect the services they provide. We think it is important that all LEED accredited professionals should, at the very least, monitor the proposed updates to the system.  USGBC expects that the next version of the LEED Rating System will be released in November 2012.
 
In addition, Schinnerer offers the following two Advisories on sustainability (limited to policyholder use only):
 

Transfer of copyright to client

From the desk of Nahom Gebre

When clients require that title ownership and copyright of the instruments of service are transferred to the client, and if the design professional chooses to agree to the transfer, we typically recommend that the client agree to the following in exchange for the transfer:
 
 
 
 
  1. The client acknowledges the documents are project-specific and are not intended for reuse on other projects.
  2. That any reuse by the client without the involvement of the design professional will be at the client’s sole risk.
  3. The client agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the design professional harmless from any claims brought against them arising out of the reuse.
  4. The design professional has the right to reuse standard details of the contract documents.
It is important that design professionals carefully review such language. In a recent contract review, I came across the following clause:
 
Client may reuse the Work Product without notice to or permission from Professional and will owe no compensation or consideration to Professional for such reuse. If Client makes any alteration to the Work Product without the consent of Professional in connection with any reuse by Client, Client shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless Professional against claims arising solely out of such alteration; provided, however, nothing herein shall be deemed to release Professional from liability for that portion of the Work Product prepared by Professional. [emphasis added]
 
At first glance it may seem that the client has provided the design professional with the recommended indemnity provision. However, note that the indemnity obligation is only limited to “any alteration to the Work Product” in connection with the reuse without the consent of the design professional. There is no indemnity obligation for a claim that arises from the reuse of the unaltered instruments of service.
 
It is essential that design professionals read contract language carefully (especially client-drafted clauses) as part of their risk management practices. It may appear that you have an important protection from your client when in reality it is not worth much. In this case it would be prudent to ask the client why they limited their indemnity obligation. What do they intend to do with the documents after this project is completed? Do they intend to reuse the work product on another project? Their answers to these questions, along with the answers to all the other questions/issues you have due to your detailed review, will help you gauge your potential exposure to the risks involved.

Contractual Liability Issues in PL policies

From the Desk of Judy Mendoza

Occasionally, clients ask design professionals to have their professional liability policy endorsed to specifically insure contractual liability.  This would provide coverage for the risks a design professional assumes in a professional services agreement.

Clients often ask for contractual liability coverage from design professionals because such coverage is found under a contractor’s CGL policy. Such a request is problematic, however, because a contractor’s CGL policy provides broad form coverage for contractual liability, due to the contractor’s broad risk exposure. Conversely, the professional liability policy provides a limited form of contractual liability coverage because a design professional’s risk exposure is limited to professional negligence.

The Schinnerer and CNA professional liability policy automatically includes a limited form contractual liability coverage that provides coverage to the extent that the liability is predicated on the insured’s negligence in providing professional services. If a request for contractual liability coverage is consistent with the coverage already provided by the policy, a special endorsement is unnecessary. On the other hand, if the contractual promises in the professional services agreement extend beyond what the policy already covers, the design firm may be assuming a business risk that is uninsurable. Examples of uninsurable contractual liabilities include express warranties and guarantees, representations that services will be free from fault and defect, and representations that the project, when finished, will be fit for its intended purpose.

Professional liability coverage is designed to pay on behalf of an insured firm that does not meet the standard of care in fulfilling professional obligations; it is not designed to stand behind all contractual obligations. By law, design professionals are liable for their own negligence as well as for the negligence of those for whom they have assumed vicarious liability (generally, professional consultants). If design professionals agree by contract to accept liability for more than this negligence, they are assuming a business risk that is not covered under the Schinnerer and CNA PL policy.

Staying warm this winter

Engineers in Sweden have found a way to channel the body heat from commuters passing through Stockholm’s Central Station to heat another building located across the street. The technology is not new (using heat exchangers to convert the excess body heat into hot water), but it does present a potentially new way of reducing heating costs. These types of solutions make sense in communities with low winter temperatures and high energy prices. The successful implementation of this technology means that we could future urban environments that are coordinated to take advantage of excess body heat.

From the Desk of Joe Jones

Contract language that may exceed coverage

When reviewing professional services agreements, it is important to not only check for issues that are business-related and risk intensive, but also ones that may fall outside the scope of your professional liability coverage. Not all issues will be obvious.

Read more...

New Contract Review Series

Now that it is 2011, we are adding a new feature to our blog, in addition to continuing to bring you the same type of content we provided in 2010. Our new feature will be written by the risk managers who review contracts for our insured design professionals.

In performing contract reviews, our risk managers often come across interesting provisions—both good and bad. We are going to highlight some of these provisions in a series of entries that will hopefully serve to inform the reader as to the different types of issues that can arise in professional services agreements.

Our next entry will be the first in this contract review series. It will discuss a liquidated damages clause. In the future, be on the lookout for more entries dealing with various unusual contractual provisions.