<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
  <title>Schinnerer&#039;s RM Blog - integrated project delivery tag</title>
  <link>http://www.schinnerer.com/blogs/rm/tags/integrated project delivery/</link>
  <description>Shortening our publishing cycle</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <copyright>Paul Riccardi</copyright>
  <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:26:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>Pebble (http://pebble.sourceforge.net)</generator>
  <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
  
  
  <item>
    <title>New IPD Coverage</title>
    <link>http://www.schinnerer.com/blogs/rm/2010/09/13/new_ipd_coverage.html</link>
    
      
        <description>
          &lt;p&gt;Schinnerer has seen few attempts at true integrated project delivery (IPD). Despite all the talk about significant changes in how projects are designed and constructed, most of the &amp;ldquo;integrated&amp;rdquo; projects we have seen are basically design-build projects using standard contract forms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&#034;margin: 0in 0in 10pt&#034;&gt;Despite this, we have been preparing for the rush of IPD projects by developing new forms of project-specific insurance that will not only cover the design team but also the increasing design liability of the construction team. The shared-risk, shared-profit collaborative aspects of IPD result in many aspects of the relationship being defined contractually.&amp;nbsp;However, it is unclear how courts will construe the provisions of multi-party agreements with extensive waivers of rights, unusual limitations on risk, and blurring of responsibilities. &amp;nbsp;Without clear law, such as the law of negligence that applies normally to design and other professional services, it is difficult to craft a responsive and affordable insurance policy specifically for IPD projects.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&#034;margin: 0in 0in 10pt&#034;&gt;While the goal of IPD is to have the parties share risk as a way to protect project-based interests, there is a misalignment of currently available insurance to cover this risk-sharing and team decision-making. The unique challenges of the IPD system can best be solved by having a project-based policy that cultivates the commonality of interests in completing a project.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&#034;margin: 0in 0in 10pt&#034;&gt;Schinnerer and CNA have responded to this gap by developing professional liability exposure coverage for all members providing design or design and construction services through a multiparty agreement on a project basis.&amp;nbsp;While this project-based coverage will not be available on extremely large or high-risk projects, it will respond to the need for a dedicated policy to cover the design exposure on projects such as office buildings, public and private educational and healthcare facilities, and certain residential, commercial, and mixed-use projects, for example.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&#034;margin: 0in 0in 10pt&#034;&gt;We also developed a special variation of the project-specific coverage for the highly unusual (and probably highly unlikely) Special Purpose Entity called for in the AIA IPD contract.&amp;nbsp;Because of the project client&amp;rsquo;s involvement as a joint owner of a limited liability company with the architect and construction manager, no current professional liability policy can cover the design risks.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&#034;margin: 0in 0in 10pt&#034;&gt;Look for more information as the coverage is rolled out nationally at &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.schinnerer.com&#034;&gt;www.Schinnerer.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;
        </description>
      
      
    
    
    
    <comments>http://www.schinnerer.com/blogs/rm/2010/09/13/new_ipd_coverage.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.schinnerer.com/blogs/rm/2010/09/13/new_ipd_coverage.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  </channel>
</rss>

