<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
  <title>Schinnerer&#039;s RM Blog - standardofcare tag</title>
  <link>http://www.schinnerer.com/blogs/rm/tags/standardofcare/</link>
  <description>Shortening our publishing cycle</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <copyright>Paul Riccardi</copyright>
  <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:26:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>Pebble (http://pebble.sourceforge.net)</generator>
  <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
  
  
  <item>
    <title>Disaster and Pro Bono Services</title>
    <link>http://www.schinnerer.com/blogs/rm/2011/04/28/disaster_and_pro_bono_services.html</link>
    
      
        <description>
          &lt;p&gt;It is unfortunate that, in general, the public discussion about the nation&amp;rsquo;s infrastructure is driven by the latest natural disaster in the news. The latest calamity is the floodwaters sweeping through the Midwest, leading to &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i5wmd6e3J-lqHcp44J3bizKIyO-A?docId=1ffb319fbb554bdb9abdf29a3c20d942&#034;&gt;ordered evacuations due to levees that failed or are in imminent danger of failing&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&#034;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&#034;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&#034;margin: 0in 0in 0pt&#034;&gt;Design professionals are often asked to provide professional services on a &lt;i&gt;pro bono&lt;/i&gt; basis after a disaster. Generally, a design professional performing voluntary services must do so in accordance with the same care and diligence as other professionals providing similar services. A failure to perform &lt;i&gt;pro bono&lt;/i&gt; services in a manner that meets the standard of care could expose the design professional to liability. Our &lt;i&gt;Management Advisory&lt;/i&gt; provides more detailed guidance for firms providing &lt;i&gt;pro bono&lt;/i&gt; services. Download the &lt;i&gt;Advisory&lt;/i&gt; at &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.schinnerer.com/risk-mgmt/Documents/ManagementAdvisories/Pro-bono.pdf&#034;&gt;www.schinnerer.com/risk-mgmt/Documents/ManagementAdvisories/Pro-bono.pdf&lt;/a&gt; (limited to current policyholders and brokers only).&lt;/div&gt;
        </description>
      
      
    
    
    
    <comments>http://www.schinnerer.com/blogs/rm/2011/04/28/disaster_and_pro_bono_services.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.schinnerer.com/blogs/rm/2011/04/28/disaster_and_pro_bono_services.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <title>“An added ‘fitness for purpose’ clause is scuppering my PI cover.”</title>
    <link>http://www.schinnerer.com/blogs/rm/2010/03/19/an_added_fitness_for_purpose_clause_is_scuppering_my_pi_cover.html</link>
    
      
      
        <description>
          &lt;p&gt;If the statement sounds strange, it is to American ears. But if you are British it makes perfectly good sense. It is part of a question asked of the executive director of the Royal Institute of British Architects Professional Services program. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;http://www.schinnerer.com/blogs/rm/2010/03/19/an_added_fitness_for_purpose_clause_is_scuppering_my_pi_cover.html&#034;&gt;Read more...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
        </description>
      
    
    
    
    <comments>http://www.schinnerer.com/blogs/rm/2010/03/19/an_added_fitness_for_purpose_clause_is_scuppering_my_pi_cover.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.schinnerer.com/blogs/rm/2010/03/19/an_added_fitness_for_purpose_clause_is_scuppering_my_pi_cover.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  </channel>
</rss>

